Awaiting reviewer assignment sage pdf reddit 0). Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Ditolak 2. They’ve also referred the manuscript to the Managing Editors (ME) and to the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend The title says it all. . Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I come back and I've been on awaiting assignment since the new year started but still there doesn't seem to have been a place for me to be placed. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Does it mean the work will be rejected? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Expand user menu Open settings menu. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. I was obsessed about my recent paper too. Current word- and semantic-based approaches treat the reviewer assignment problem (RAP) as an information retrieval problem but do not take into account two constraints of the RAP: incompleteness of the reviewer data and Thank you for your question. This change has occurred Production Center Guide Contributor Form Updates Production Center Guide (Subscription Journals) Production Center Steps After a manuscript is accepted in Sage Track, it will move into the Production Workflow. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". This all came form my department manager. This change has occurred I've recently been doing a whole bunch of research into software for each purpose, and PDF readers are one of the staples. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Reddit. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Contains all the . The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Join ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". This makes a customizable PDF planner (like the one sold by My Deep Guide) unusable imo. Logging In 1. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the reviewer search results, or by clicking on the spyglass icon next to a reviewer’s name. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page r/BritishColumbia is dedicated to all things related to the Canadian province of British Columbia, situated on the stunning West Coast. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". United States Air Force Academy. The discussions in this reddit should be of an academic nature, and should avoid "pop psychology. That's an over-simplification, clearly, but this is the dynamic people talk about when they joke about Reviewer #2. We are on version Sage 50 Quantum Accounting 2024 Build 31. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Hi everyone. So, please give me Now I am curious about what this might mean. 0. Diterima dengan I wanted to volunteer to be a reviewer, and I was wondering how to do that. Still waiting. The status of the paper changed several times. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Timelines for Each Step: The process includes specific timeframes for each step, from initial receipt (7-14 days) to the final decision Recently, I have been seeing Awaiting Assignment posts and I am starting to get really nervous that this is some ploy to save the company money from having me in AA and that my offer is at risk of being rescinded. If you read this. This problem can be viewed as a version of the well-known generalised assignment problem (GAP) [1]. Having two statuses for a single manuscript is uncommon. Try to approach the process as someone who is trying to get better science published. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". Since I haven't received my interim, I haven't started working yet, despite getting an offer early in the year. The contributor Assigning appropriate reviewers to a manuscript from a pool of candidate reviewers is a common challenge in the academic community. PDF | Assigning paper to Specially, this survey first discusses the background and necessity of automatic reviewer assignment, and then systematically summarize the existing research work from AP Classroom Assignment Submission I have a question, I finished my FRQ but never submitted it myself because I was going to check over it, I forgot to check over my FRQ which is ok, but the due date past and it automatically submitted. Hey I made a post in the sage reddit over here: Sage 50 Quantum Backup Question. I have previously published in the same journal PDF | Peer review is an integral component of scientific research. I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. You get an awaiting assignment charge number, and what you do depends in leadership on yourself. The EiC at that time said they'll look The title says it all. 5 months, so I thought it was being reviewed by reviewers. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Don't even think about using Sage's own support, they'll just let you hang for hours on the phone before even taking your call, and you'll end up with people reading KBs. 2. Then I got pulled to a temp assignment with a different charge number. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. The problem is I have trouble reviewing for long periods of time if I don't like the font/formatting of what I'm reading, hence I make my own notes even if it's copy-pasted from a reviewer lang. I made the mistake of accidentally modifying a single vector line in a PDF on my Mac (using the Dropbox sync feature). " Does it mean that my paper will go through It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. what does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision. Once the manuscript has been paired with appropriate journals, Sage Path offers transfer links for smooth and easy submission. sino pong may reviewer for CSE? gagi ngayon ko nalang naalala mag Skip to main content. The under review date changed after 25 Back To Top. This change has occurred Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? Different perspective - I work as a reviewer for them, and I like to think I do decent work - I actually really like helping my interns develop graduate school applications and after doing that a few years I thought I’d give college essays a shot. However, we have explained the statuses below: Awaiting Second Opinion: This means that the associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and has made a tentative decision on it. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. You can sometimes get the decision on very funky and unexpected times. This rule is in place to ensure that an ample audience can freely discuss life in the Netherlands under a widely-spoken common tongue. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. I am thinking an AE has turned his review based on the 3 reviewers' comments so the main editor can make the decision later? 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. So far I only tried requesting to review a couple of journals through Elsevier, but haven't gotten any yet. Becker. Well, shame on me. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural The funny thing is that I initially suggested this reviewer to the editor, because I like their research. It was "Under Review" for 2. Tldr: reviewer hinders timely publication because of his own submission. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. xml Templates Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Can't speak based on my own experience about how to get off awaiting assignment. people here have been saying that you should approach people and let them know you're interested to Admin processing consists of checking the manuscript for plagiarism, language usage and verifying the structure of the manuscript according to the guide for authors. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. My guess is either some deadline The recommendation and assignment of reviewers and articles is an emerging topic in the academic community, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP). A place to share and discuss articles/issues related to all fields of psychology. I submitted in late june and the review process seems to have gone as they said it would. VA Disability Claim Steps: The VA disability claim process consists of eight steps, each designed to ensure a thorough and fair evaluation of your evidence, guiding the claim from submission to completion. Awaiting Assignment Limbo I just started at RMD as a software engineer last week and now that I’ve finished my trainings no one is giving me very clear direction on what to do. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. What I fail to understand is why should I work as a reviewer without getting paid for it. Popular answers (1) Karin L. No academic should feel confident saying it is or it's not normal to only get one reviewer since reviewer data is private and inaccessible (please correct me if I'm wrong). Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. I wouldn't worry just yet. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Sage Path is a free article transfer service that helps authors find the right journal for their manuscript. So, from your experience, is this generally a bad or good sign? The previous status was “awaiting reviewer scores”. My leadership has spoken to everyone on awaiting assignment and people on the programs who would be affected by contracting/funding issues. This guy called me back and when I pushed him he admitted that he was not with Sage and claim to be with a company that consults for Sage. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. This may, however, vary across journals. Where possible, this will be done by the original reviewers to check whether their comments have been addressed, however, if they are not available, other My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I’m not able to meet my supervisor at the moment as they are away. The assignment of suitable, high-quality reviewers is critical to identifying scientific But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. My manager also told me that everyone on awaiting assignment needs to make a mandatory come back to the office and that's when I r/Sage50: For users of Sage 50 ERP system for small to medium businesses. If you would like to confirm the invitation with the editorial office, their contact information can be found in the Manuscript Submission Guidelines. It highlighted my references, of course, the title, subheadings, and all of one paragraph, which listed the American Psychological Association's ethical principles and codes of conduct for boundaries of competence. How does JID Journals use the R-Score? We only rate reviews on quality. It's a Google Drive link. Hi All! I'm an Presently, I'm very much interested in learning Sage 50 software, but I'm yet to find an online platform that'll suit me and one I have submitted to a journal where "editor assignment pending" meant assignment of reviewers by the editor was pending, not that the assignment of an editor at all was pending. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. You also shouldn't trust journal statements regarding this issue because they have an incentive to promote the idea that each paper is reviewed by multiple people, since that is what peer review demands. Can I assume my manuscript is going out to peer review!? This is my second choice of journal and it was desk rejected at the first so this would be one step better! Bear in mind that all academics have just had to pivot all their teaching from in-person to online, are scrambling to prepare for a very strange and unpredictable new academic year, have had to help their senior / research students reconfigure their projects and, if they’re very lucky, are taking a couple of weeks of summer vacation. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . 0099 I noticed recently that there are post/comments related to CSC. SAGE 50 Learning Material . I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Just a heads up to everyone. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. This Journal recommends that authors follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals formulated by the International Reddit. To generalize, Reviewer #1 may give constructive feedback, but Reviewer #2 is a notorious asshole who provides off-base, insulting comments. " Required Reviews Complete: This status I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). A copy of the reviewer list will be available. This change has occurred Reviewer List. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I resubmitted my manuscript to a journal through ScholarOne. Welcome to /r/Netherlands! Only English should be used for posts and comments. Now, the assignment given was super basic. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". e. – Parnian. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Reached out to the editor but no response. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. While there has been much research on RAP, ther After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. We give authors the ability to search and refine journals according to their preferences using our Journal Recommender. And it can definitely take 20 days to find three people willing to review a paper. Took about 2 weeks to assign reviewers, then it was “Under Review” for about 9 weeks. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Better hope I never see you at a conference. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Most Sage Journals utilize a submission system, so please be wary of e-mail invitations from a journal with an online system; reviewer invitations are only sent via the system. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Now the status is makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. But my question is as below. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. TL;DR: you can read PDFs on the Sage. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision? Question. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. Hello, got a talk with my manager Friday where he couldn't really look me in the eye and was telling me something about Contracts running low and having to put some people on awaiting assignment myself included. Deciding which of a good if awaiting assignment stage if only one reviewer agrees to review and security metrics to be to wait! Similar experience with performance and many editors and is in the submission. Forms Tracking. If Sage development teams have to be involved, this is the worst. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Before they review their peer’s papers, I lead them through things to look for: last name/page number in too, rh corner, header w correct date format (MLA), title structure, intro structure, thesis, etc. The contributor form will be First of all, I feel you. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Thank you very much for your insight. When I asked about my status, the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Information for IJRR Reviewers. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Log In / Sign Up; Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . I am really beginning to worry. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Yesterday I checked the paper and the status had changed to “awaiting final decision”. Skip to main content. Once you have resubmitted your paper, it will once again be reviewed. I spend all my Saturdays writing, citing, proofing, editing, and first submitting to SafeAssign as a draft. My security clearance is still being investigated and all I am told is that I’m waiting to be assigned to a team that ‘fits my strengths’. For context, I'm in engineering (PhD + 7 years of experience in industry, about a dozen publications). I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. ). , and then they look it over on their own to catch those and additional Well, there are "Reviewer #2" memes and jokes for a reason. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. Reviewer 2 is usually a grad student who was given the assignment by their PI and has a bone to pick with the editorial process. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Does anyone have any idea why That's all really good advice. They are telling us to apply to other teams ASAP or risk the possibility of layoffs. Mine is 5 months and still no feedback. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Manuscript Submission Guidelines for New Media & Society. 4 answers. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. I'm not too sure what this means, they said I would start charging overhead and I should update my internal resume. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and This week I completed a take home assignment in Java using Spring (as requested) and the next day received this rejection via the 3rd party recruiter. These reviewer guidelines provide insight into the peer review process with an emphasis on information reviewers need to know to conduct and complete their recommendation. I teach 1102 (research writing) and have students do in-class peer reviews as the last step before submission. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. I'm waiting on my security clearance. I won't give away the exact problem domain, but it Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. On this page, you will find: What is Sage Track? How do I create an account in Sage Track? How do I review using Sage Track? Where can I find help using Sage Track? What if the journal I’m reviewing for doesn’t use an online submission system? Reviewer Center Display for Sage Track Review Display Updating your Availability in Sage Track What is Sage Track? In this talk, we will explore the critical challenges associated specifically with the assignment of reviewers to submitted papers. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. We do not require AEs to give each review a score, but the The previous status was "Awaiting allocation of AE". Whether it's decent depends on your definition of “decent”. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. Most recent answer. While ther Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. How did this happen? Yeah just send the journal a message. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Mine does. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. The current web results for this are disappointing to say the least, with review sites doing very little to highlight Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The journal well I'm not sure. I know that up to the date of 16th of April the 3rd reviewer had turned his/her review. Can I annotate PDF books with the stylus on the Sage? I don't have a Sage so I can't speak from experience, but I take their help page about making notes with the Kobo Stylus, particularly the section about notes on PDF files, to mean that you can. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. How does paper reviewer assignment work at ML/AI conferences like AAAI? [R] From the PC member's perspective, I know that they get to rate how interested they are in reviewing various papers. View. It's a compilation of all the Reviewers that I have downloaded back then. Awaiting Reviewer • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. This change has occurred and it will become part of the reviewer's score. r/AskPH A chip A close button. taken a b grade journal. But since the status date has changed once more, I don't know what to make of it. We will introduce Reviewerly, our innovative solution designed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of reviewer assignments by leveraging data from diverse sources, including OpenAlex, PubMed, and DBLP. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Get help with your research. Thank you, William, for your prompt reply. The contributor form will be My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Most journals want to know if the manuscript (1) is suitable for the subject matter of the publication, (2) has "novelty" i. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. I hope this reviewer will help. Size is about 230MB. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. presents new and interesting knowledge not already done by other authors, and (3) is written to a high standard of quality. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Download . What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Djaafar Zemali. I've been dealing with personal issues so haven't followed up. Now the device can no PDF | Appropriate reviewer assignment significantly impacts the quality of proposal evaluation, as accurate and fair reviews are contingent on their I'm being frequently mailed by a journal (it belongs in the biomedical field with an IF of around 3. Sure enough Sage confirmed they have no affiliation with the invoice and no one from their expert team has contacted me yet. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? but the other reviewer was not satisfied and recommended rejection. Today it went back to "awaiting After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Manuscript Submission Guidelines: New Media & Society. " This is also a place to talk about your own psychology research, methods, and career in order to gain input from our vast psychology community. I was told to at first to help with an MBSE cameo project, so me and some people did that. Answer this I submitted my manuscript to a journal. The EiC at that time said they'll look Reviewer List. The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Refer to the journal's guideline for reviewers and/or authors depending what is made available to you. Expand user menu Open Puntahan mo school assignment mo at least isang araw bago ang exam, para matantya So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. From local news and events to breathtaking scenery and outdoor activities, this community is a hub for British Columbians and anyone interested in He sent me an invoice and I contacted Sage to verify. If I withdraw my submission now, I'll forfeit all the time I've already invested in waiting. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Their work is still great. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Then it said “Awaiting Recommendation” for 2 weeks, and now as of a My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. To provide Sage support, you need Sage experts. the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject of research for thirty years now. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. But it would have also been great without messing with mine. This change Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing (Due Date Passed But Prior to Reviewer Assignment) It's been about 3 months since the July 05, 2023 deadline, What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Make sure you The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Some basic incidents took weeks to resolve. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Manuscripts in the “In Production” queues have not yet gone to production and require additional processing by a journal admin or editor. Thank you for your question. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". A lot of bar review tips say it's counterproductive to make your own reviewer since it takes too much time, and I get it. Application status still says "awaiting required documents" even though I've submitted everything I need to Admissions My application status on Join UofT still says "awaiting required documents," even though I've submitted all of the ones they put on the list. 00. El-Oued University. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Summary of Key Points. Regarding your specific situation, I guess it depends on the journal, I think it means the review process is concluding, not starting (seems unlikely that half a year after submitting they'll only start it). After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. fkn tdrzpfzf dyo lpyts pzyvt bykvf mwt uztlfkg ioyjrv lbz